ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Pharmacovigilance signals for congenital heart disease related to drug exposure: A disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This real-world study aimed to identify pharmacovigilance signals for congenital heart disease (CHD) associated with drugs exposure and to characterize the phenotypic spectrum of CHD adverse event reports. Methods: Adverse event reports for drug potentially associated with CHD were collected from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) between January 2004 and September 2025. We used reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) to detect pharmacovigilance signals. The Bonferroni correction was employed to adjust for multiple comparisons and to further confirm the robustness of the signals. Results: We identified a total of 871 drugs with reported signals for CHD, of which 67 drugs met the criteria across all four disproportionality analysis methods. These drugs covered a wide range of categories, with nervous system agents and systemic antiinfectives being the most numerous. Further stratified analysis by therapeutic class revealed that antidepressive agents ( Conclusion: Through a comprehensive analysis of FAERS data, we identified pharmacovigilance signals for CHD associated with drug exposure and described the phenotypes of reported CHD events with suspected drug involvement. Our findings provide a valuable reference for hypothesis generation and future epidemiologic studies, and they support the ongoing pharmacovigilance of drug safety particularly during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.