Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756651›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health research2026

Taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages: Perspectives of adults and nursing practitioners in Makhanda, Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Lanine Herman, Nelene Koen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lanine HermanDivision of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1584-3741
Nelene KoenDivision of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption has been linked to the rising prevalence of obesity and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in South Africa. In April 2018, the country introduced an SSB tax-known as the Health Promotion Levy (HPL)-as a fiscal measure to reduce excessive sugar consumption and curb the rise of overweight, obesity, and NCDs. Although national evidence indicates product reformulation, community-level awareness and perceptions, particularly in low-socioeconomic settings, remain unclear. Objectives: To assess adults' awareness, beliefs, and self-reported behaviour changes related to the SSB tax, and to explore nursing practitioners' understanding, perceptions of its impact on consumer behaviour, and views on their educational role at primary health care (PHC) facilities in Makhanda, Eastern Cape. Design and methods: A multi-method, cross-sectional design was used. Quantitative data were collected from adults (n = 275) at seven PHC facilities through an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Qualitative data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with nursing practitioners (n = 10) at the same facilities. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, and the results were integrated for interpretation. Results: Ninety-six percent of adults (n = 264), based on the interviewer-administered questionnaire, were unaware of the SSB tax, while 98% (n = 269) reported no change in consumption since implementation. Nursing practitioners displayed limited awareness of the tax's rationale and timing but supported taxation as a public health strategy. Conclusions: The SSB tax demonstrates limited perceived impact in this setting. Strengthened community education, awareness campaigns, and improved policy implementation are required to enhance effectiveness.

Indexed as

health promotion levyperspectivesSouth Africasugar-sweetened beveragestaxation

Identifiers

PMID42756651
PMCPMC13583249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.