ReviewInternational journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research2026
Role of Three-Dimensional Convolution Neural Networks (3D-CNN) in Image Processing and Recognition in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (3D CNNs) have transformed oncology imaging, excelling in tumor detection, classification, segmentation, and prognosis prediction. Unlike traditional two-dimensional CNNs, 3D CNNs effectively analyze volumetric medical imaging data, enhancing spatial feature extraction and diagnostic accuracy across modalities, including CT, MRI, PET, and ultrasound. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of 3D CNNs across 22 studies, of which 11 were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.72, 0.73, and 0.77, respectively, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 10.38, indicating favorable discriminative ability. Subgroup analyses demonstrated superior accuracy in lung cancer and CT-based models, with DenseNet and ResNet architectures outperforming traditional CNNs. Technical innovations-including multi-modal fusion, spatial context integration, and explainable AI techniques-enhance model robustness and clinician trust. However, substantial heterogeneity (I² > 95%) across studies, attributable to differences in imaging protocols, dataset quality, and model design, underscores the need for standardized methodologies. Persistent challenges include computational demands, annotation variability, and generalization limitations. Future directions should prioritize the integration of explainable AI, PACS-compatible user interfaces, and federated learning frameworks to bridge institutional gaps. This review highlights the considerable promise of 3D CNNs in advancing precision oncology, while also identifying the infrastructural and methodological refinements necessary for widespread clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.