Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756617›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research2026

Role of Three-Dimensional Convolution Neural Networks (3D-CNN) in Image Processing and Recognition in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sanjeev Kumar Jain, Shehzeen Afaq, Sonika Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sanjeev Kumar JainDepartment of Anatomy, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Teerthanker Mahaveer University Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shehzeen AfaqDepartment of Anatomy, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Teerthanker Mahaveer University Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sonika SharmaDepartment of Anatomy, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College and Research Centre, Teerthanker Mahaveer University Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (3D CNNs) have transformed oncology imaging, excelling in tumor detection, classification, segmentation, and prognosis prediction. Unlike traditional two-dimensional CNNs, 3D CNNs effectively analyze volumetric medical imaging data, enhancing spatial feature extraction and diagnostic accuracy across modalities, including CT, MRI, PET, and ultrasound. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of 3D CNNs across 22 studies, of which 11 were eligible for quantitative synthesis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.72, 0.73, and 0.77, respectively, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 10.38, indicating favorable discriminative ability. Subgroup analyses demonstrated superior accuracy in lung cancer and CT-based models, with DenseNet and ResNet architectures outperforming traditional CNNs. Technical innovations-including multi-modal fusion, spatial context integration, and explainable AI techniques-enhance model robustness and clinician trust. However, substantial heterogeneity (I² > 95%) across studies, attributable to differences in imaging protocols, dataset quality, and model design, underscores the need for standardized methodologies. Persistent challenges include computational demands, annotation variability, and generalization limitations. Future directions should prioritize the integration of explainable AI, PACS-compatible user interfaces, and federated learning frameworks to bridge institutional gaps. This review highlights the considerable promise of 3D CNNs in advancing precision oncology, while also identifying the infrastructural and methodological refinements necessary for widespread clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Cancer diagnosticsOncology imagingThree-dimensional convolutional neural networksTumor classificationTumor segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42756617
PMCPMC13583153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.