Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756611›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research2026

The Iranian National Guideline for Invasive Fungal Infections (IFI) in Hematology-Oncology: An Expert Consensus Report.

Fereshteh Ghiasvand, Ghasem Janbabaei, Babak Arjmand, Seyed Ali Mirhosseini, Mobin Mohammadi, Alireza Saif Hashemi, Pershang Nazemi, Neda Alijani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fereshteh GhiasvandDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ghasem JanbabaeiHematologic Malignancies Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Babak ArjmandHematologic Malignancies Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Ali MirhosseiniCell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mobin MohammadiIranian Cancer Control Center, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza Saif HashemiHematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pershang NazemiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Yas Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neda AlijaniHematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Research Institute for Oncology, Hematology and Cell Therapy, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections are a leading cause of death in patients with hematological malignancies and those receiving bone marrow transplants. Although standard guidelines exist globally, their direct application in Iran is not always possible due to differences in the types of common fungi and limited diagnostic and therapeutic facilities. To address this challenge, a national committee of experts in the field was formed to carefully review internationally recognized protocols published up to 2024 and solicit opinions from selected experts across the country to develop the first national guideline specifically for prophylaxis. To ensure methodological rigor, the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) framework and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system were utilized. The resulting consensus established a localized risk-stratification model identifying acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) patients as high-risk, recommending posaconazole as the primary standard. Notably, the guideline advises against routine azole use in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) to prevent neurotoxicity. Furthermore, a resource-tiered framework was developed for centers with varying diagnostic capabilities. The result of this effort was to present a tiered and local model that provides a practical solution for both well-equipped and limited facilities. The existence of this national guideline creates a major advantage in that treatment approaches are unified and standardized across the country. By eliminating discretionary decisions, this document helps to better manage medication use and ultimately improve patient outcomes, regardless of the city in which they are treated or the facilities they are treated at.

Indexed as

Clinical guidelineConsensus reportHematological malignanciesInvasive fungal infectionsProphylactic management

Identifiers

PMID42756611
PMCPMC13583157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.