Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756585›Full record

ArticleAdvances in orthopedics2026

CT-Based Radiostereometric Analysis: A Promising Alternative to Conventional Radiostereometric Analysis in Determining Polyethylene Wear in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Elin Kramer, Olof Sandberg, Anders Brüggemann, Nils P Hailer, Olof Sköldenberg, Cyrus Brodén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in orthopedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elin KramerSection of Orthopedics and Hand Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, uu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5514-953X
Olof SandbergSectra AB, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5825-1692
Anders BrüggemannSection of Orthopedics and Hand Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, uu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-253X
Nils P HailerSection of Orthopedics and Hand Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, uu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3233-2638
Olof SköldenbergDivision of Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, ki.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4155-8425
Cyrus BrodénSection of Orthopedics and Hand Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden, uu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9801-2733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: CT-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) enables the measurement of early implant migration after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) with high precision and accuracy at a low effective radiation dose. This study is the first to investigate whether CT-RSA might be comparable to conventional radiostereometric analysis(RSA) even for in vivo polyethylene liner wear measurements after THA. Purpose: To evaluate the comparability of CT-based RSA and conventional RSA for measuring polyethylene liner wear after THA. Materials and Methods: A total of 8 patients treated with a reverse hybrid THA (cemented cup and uncemented stem) were included from an ongoing RSA study. CT-RSA and RSA images were taken immediately postoperatively and after 6 years to compare measurements of the polyethylene wear. Double examinations were performed to estimate the precision of the CT-RSA method. Results: Wear measured as median proximal translation of the femoral head into the cup at 6 years was 0.10 mm (IQR 0.02-0.17 mm) as measured by RSA and 0.13 mm (IQR 0.04-0.27 mm) by CT-RSA. Bland-Altman plots indicated good agreement between the methods; for proximal wear the mean difference between methods was 0.04 mm (limits of agreement -0.37-0.46 mm). Proximal wear precision was 0.16 mm for RSA and 0.15 mm for CT-RSA. The mean effective radiation dose was 0.2 mSv per CT scan and 0.04 mSv per RSA scan. Conclusion: This exploratory study suggests that CT-RSA provides wear measurements comparable to those obtained with conventional RSA and may therefore represent a viable alternative for evaluating liner wear in future implant studies.

Indexed as

CT-RSARSAtotal hip arthroplastywear

Identifiers

PMID42756585
PMCPMC13583166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.