ArticleAdvances in orthopedics2026
CT-Based Radiostereometric Analysis: A Promising Alternative to Conventional Radiostereometric Analysis in Determining Polyethylene Wear in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Article in Advances in orthopedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: CT-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) enables the measurement of early implant migration after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) with high precision and accuracy at a low effective radiation dose. This study is the first to investigate whether CT-RSA might be comparable to conventional radiostereometric analysis(RSA) even for in vivo polyethylene liner wear measurements after THA. Purpose: To evaluate the comparability of CT-based RSA and conventional RSA for measuring polyethylene liner wear after THA. Materials and Methods: A total of 8 patients treated with a reverse hybrid THA (cemented cup and uncemented stem) were included from an ongoing RSA study. CT-RSA and RSA images were taken immediately postoperatively and after 6 years to compare measurements of the polyethylene wear. Double examinations were performed to estimate the precision of the CT-RSA method. Results: Wear measured as median proximal translation of the femoral head into the cup at 6 years was 0.10 mm (IQR 0.02-0.17 mm) as measured by RSA and 0.13 mm (IQR 0.04-0.27 mm) by CT-RSA. Bland-Altman plots indicated good agreement between the methods; for proximal wear the mean difference between methods was 0.04 mm (limits of agreement -0.37-0.46 mm). Proximal wear precision was 0.16 mm for RSA and 0.15 mm for CT-RSA. The mean effective radiation dose was 0.2 mSv per CT scan and 0.04 mSv per RSA scan. Conclusion: This exploratory study suggests that CT-RSA provides wear measurements comparable to those obtained with conventional RSA and may therefore represent a viable alternative for evaluating liner wear in future implant studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.