ArticleBMJ public health2026
How are instant messaging applications used informally for paediatric health consultations in Pakistan? A qualitative study with caregivers and healthcare providers in Punjab.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The informal use of instant messaging applications for healthcare consultations is rapidly increasing in low- and middle-income countries. Despite its widespread adoption, there is limited research on how these tools are implemented, experienced by users and integrated into health systems. This study aims to provide insight into the practical functioning, perceived value and key challenges of WhatsApp-based paediatric consultations in Pakistan. Methods: We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study using an interpretive approach across multiple healthcare settings in Punjab. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were held with 19 parents (13 mothers, 6 fathers) and 12 healthcare providers who actively used WhatsApp for paediatric consultations. Data were analysed thematically, guided by the newly developed ACCESS-Loop model. Results: WhatsApp was used as a user-driven, informal digital channel for paediatric consultations. Access was mediated through social capital and provider altruism, compensating for systemic barriers. Clinical practice involved 'digital auscultation' via multimedia, with providers and parents jointly negotiating diagnostic uncertainty and informal triage thresholds. While this approach enhanced access and convenience, it was marked by a trade-off between interpersonal trust and data privacy and substantial provider burden. Conclusion: WhatsApp-based paediatric consultations represent a complex, grassroots adaptation to healthcare system limitations. While enhancing access, this informal system poses significant challenges regarding clinical quality, patient safety, provider well-being, data privacy and equity. The findings underscore the need for contextually appropriate guidelines, training and policy interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.