ArticleMediterranean journal of rheumatology2026
Cardiovascular Safety Signals of Osteoporosis Therapies: A FAERS Pharmacovigilance Study.
Article in Mediterranean journal of rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the associations between commonly used osteoporosis medications and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) using data from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of FAERS reports between January 2019 and December 2024, identifying all reports involving alendronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid, denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide, or romosozumab. MACE outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, atrial fibrillation (A-fib), and cardiac failure (CF), defined using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Preferred Terms. Disproportionality was assessed using reporting odds ratios (RORs), with signals defined by a lower 95% confidence interval >1. All analyses were descriptive and hypothesis-generating. Results: FAERS contained more than 30 million adverse event reports during the study period. Romosozumab demonstrated the highest ROR for MI (2.38) and stroke (3.72), and also showed elevated signals for A-fib and CF (ROR 3.76). Zoledronic acid showed notable associations with stroke (ROR 2.42) and A-fib (ROR 3.22). Denosumab and abaloparatide were associated with the lowest RORs across all cardiovascular outcomes. Alendronate and risedronate demonstrated intermediate disproportionality signals, particularly for A-fib and CF. Conclusion: Romosozumab and zoledronic acid demonstrated prominent cardiovascular disproportionality signals in FAERS, whereas denosumab, abaloparatide, and teriparatide showed more favorable reporting profiles. These findings should not discourage osteoporosis treatment but underscore the importance of individualised cardiovascular risk assessment and the need for further prospective evaluation to inform safe therapy selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.