ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Pharmacological management in frontotemporal dementia and patient outcomes: a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX platform.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Symptomatic treatment remains the cornerstone of therapeutic management in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), as disease-modifying therapies are currently unavailable. However, several medications originally developed for other neuropsychiatric conditions may represent potentially harmful medications (PHMs) in FTD. This study aimed to describe prescribing patterns following an FTD diagnosis and to evaluate the association between PHM exposure and hospital-based acute care (HBAC) utilization. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a global health research network comprising clinical data from real-world settings. We included 179 individuals with an electronic health record (EHR)-recorded diagnosis of FTD from 43 healthcare organizations across the United States. Propensity-score matching balanced baseline characteristics, with propensity scores estimated by logistic regression. Risk ratios were calculated from observed event proportions in the matched cohorts, and time to first event was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates and a Cox proportional hazards model. Patients with at least one recorded PHM prescription after diagnosis formed the exposed cohort; those with none formed the unexposed cohort. The two cohorts were matched 1:1 using propensity scores to minimize confounding and to balance key demographic and clinical variables between groups. HBAC was defined as hospital inpatient or observation care, emergency department visits, or critical care services. Among the 179 individuals with FTD (mean age 67.9 ± 14.9 years; 48.0% women), 71 (39.7%) were exposed to PHMs. After propensity-score matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced (56 patients per group). Overall, 39.7% of patients received at least one PHM, most commonly benzodiazepines (69.5%). In matched analyses, PHM exposure was associated with a significantly higher risk of HBAC [risk ratio (RR) = 2.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.35-3.57] and lower event-free survival (12.8% vs. 62.7%). This real-world study of post-diagnosis prescribing in FTD shows that PHM use is common and that a greater proportion of exposed patients experienced HBAC, with a shorter time to the first event; given residual confounding by indication, these findings are exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than causal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.