ArticleMedical science educator2026
Changes to Master Adaptive Learning in the Pre-Clerkship Phase of Medical School.
Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Adaptive expertise or the ability to self-assess, create a learning plan, incorporate self-assessment and feedback, adjust practices with newly learned skills, and address gaps is a core skill in medicine. The Master Adaptive Learner model (MAL) describes a framework to develop adaptive expertise, but studies have not measured adaptive learning during medical school, which limits our ability to design curricular strategies. This study investigated changes in master adaptive learning during the pre-clerkship phase of medical school. Materials and Methods: This study was a single-cohort within-subject design. Medical students were administered the MAL Instrument at matriculation, end of M1 year and end of M2 year. The MAL instrument included 16 items measured on a 5-point Likert agreement scale measuring 4 factors representing adaptive learning, resilience, curiosity, and motivation. Across and within-subjects ANOVA was used to detect changes in MAL. Results: There were 174 respondents at matriculation, 81 at the end of M1, and 150 at the end of M2 survey (response rates respectively 94%,41%,89%). 65 students had matched data across all three time points. MAL mean scores increased during the M2 phase for MAL overall and each subfactor. Adaptive learning decreased during the M1 phase but resilience, motivation, and curiosity factors were stable. Discussion: Medical students MAL scores increased in the M2 phase of the curriculum. The transition into medical school may challenge students' ability to apply adaptive learning strategies, particularly as they continue developing the metacognitive skills needed to navigate a more complex learning environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.