Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756444›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2026

Enhancing eXcellence Through Community, Empowerment, and Learning (EXCEL): a Pilot Study of a Self-Determination Theory-Informed Peer-Facilitated Psychoeducational Intervention for Health Sciences Trainees.

S N Mladen, Y Zhai, C A Gorman, D A Rogers, R Rampe, S McCarthy, D Watson, L M Boitet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S N MladenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Medicine, Richmond, VA USA.
Y ZhaiSchool of Human Development and Organizational Studies in Education, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
C A GormanDepartment of Management, Information Systems, and Quantitative Methods, UAB, Birmingham, AL USA.
D A RogersUAB Medicine Office of Wellness, Birmingham, AL USA.
R RampeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurobiology, UAB, Birmingham, AL USA.
S McCarthyDepartment of Human Studies, UAB, Birmingham, AL USA.
D WatsonDepartment of Human Studies, UAB, Birmingham, AL USA.
L M BoitetUAB Medicine Office of Wellness, Birmingham, AL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3273-9849

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health sciences trainees experience substantial distress from factors derived from the learning environment. Yet traditional training programs rarely provide structured opportunities to build autonomy-supportive nontechnical skills needed to navigate these challenges. To address this gap, we developed and evaluated a novel peer-led psychoeducational group intervention designed for health sciences trainees grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT). This program aimed to strengthen trainees' access to resources supporting competence, relatedness, and autonomy through three structured components: psychoeducation, guided discussion, and targeted skill-development. A pre-post design was used to collect Work-Related Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction Scale (BPNS-W) and perceived stress data, and the post-session survey included items from the Session Wants and Needs Outcome Measure (SWAN-OM) and two general evaluation questions. Mean-level paired analyses demonstrated a significant increase in resource acquisition related to autonomy, and perceived stress decreased significantly from pre- to post-session. Importantly, latent change score modeling revealed substantial variability in individual trajectories, and indicated trainees with lower baseline basic psychological need satisfaction showed the largest gains, which were statistically significant across all three SDT domains. Trainees positively evaluated the program, reporting that they felt listened to, and were able to identify self-support strategies and explore their feelings. Participants also indicated that they found the sessions helpful and were likely to attend future sessions. Together, this study supports the utility of an SDT-informed, peer-facilitated intervention model for reducing trainee perceived stress and strengthening resources in support of basic psychological need satisfaction.

Indexed as

Peer supportProfessional developmentSelf-determination theoryTrainee

Identifiers

PMID42756444
PMCPMC13582717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.