ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
Conformational dynamics of fuzzy interfaces in disordered protein complexes: mapping key residues and binding modes beyond NMR models.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the dynamic behavior of fuzzy complexes formed by intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) is challenging due to their conformational flexibility. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) structural bundles satisfy experimental constraints and inherently provide an overview of alternative conformations in solution. However, they assign equal weight to every sampled model, obscuring the temporal prevalence and dynamics of inter-residue contacts. In this study, we performed dual 1-microsecond (µs) Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations for eight biologically relevant fuzzy complexes, utilizing the most distant conformers from deposited NMR models, as starting configurations. Through structural clustering and contact-persistence analysis, we classified the complexes into two distinct dynamic categories. The first group comprises complexes whose trajectories remain consistent with experimental data. Notably, large-scale motions such as relative chain rotations observed during simulations are already reflected as distinct orientations within the starting NMR conformers. Conversely, the second group comprises complexes that exhibit interaction modes absent in the structural NMR ensembles. These include alternative stable interfaces arising from chain reorientation, as well as highly dynamic interfaces characterized by rapidly exchanging contacts lacking any persistent stabilizing core. Furthermore, the microsecond trajectories captured intermittent dissociation and re-association events where the proteins sampled transient contacts through alternative regions. Overall, leveraging NMR models as a baseline for MD clustering and contact weighting, provides a systematic bioinformatics analysis to solve the atomistic details of flexible interfaces. Beyond categorizing diverse binding behaviors, this approach systematically refines the interaction surfaces across all studied cases, uncovers dynamic features that escape detection in ensemble-averaged NMR structures. Furthermore, it maps key residues to guide further experimental approaches, such as mutational studies or therapeutic targeting, among other applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.