Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756409›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2026

Fluopyram in agricultural ecosystems: environmental fate, microbial transformation, ecotoxicity, and resistance risks of an SDHI fungicide.

Chaoqun Zhang, Muhammad Zafar Ullah, Chengwei Guan, Mustansar Mubeen, Yongliang Ding, Yasir Iftikhar, Wenmei Zhang, Muhammad Asam Riaz, Muhammad Tanveer Altaf, Ahmed Mahmoud Ismail and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chaoqun Zhang *Jiangxi Tobacco Science Research Institute, Nanchang, China.
Muhammad Zafar Ullah *Centre of Excellence for Citrus, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Chengwei GuanJiangxi Tobacco Science Research Institute, Nanchang, China.
Mustansar Mubeen *School of Life Sciences and Medical Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei, China.
Yongliang DingJiangxi Tobacco Science Research Institute, Nanchang, China.
Yasir IftikharCentre of Excellence for Citrus, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Wenmei ZhangJiangxi Tobacco Science Research Institute, Nanchang, China.
Muhammad Asam RiazDepartment of Entomology, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Muhammad Tanveer AltafDepartment of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize/Pazar, Türkiye.
Ahmed Mahmoud IsmailPests and Plant Diseases Unit, College of Agricultural and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Brijendra Kumar KashyapDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Bundelkhand University, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Manoj Kumar SolankiDepartment of Life Sciences and Biological Sciences, IES University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Jie WangTobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingdao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluopyram is a next-generation succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicide, which is very popular in the management of economically significant fungal conditions in cereals, fruits, vegetables, and ornamental crops. It works by inhibiting the complex II present in the mitochondria by blocking succinate dehydrogenase, which electron transport and energy generation, eventually hindering fungal development leading to death of the pathogen. Besides having good fungicidal effects, fluopyram has also demonstrated a nematicidal effect, which has also enhanced its utility in various agricultural systems. Empirical studies indicate that SDHIs can induce mortality, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and developmental delays in non-target organisms. Additionally, the environmental persistence of these compounds raises concerns about their potential for ecological disruption. The extensive and growing use of SDHIs however has also given rise to the issue of resistance development with recorded resistance cases in a number of fungal populations and has placed a strong demand on the need to use crop rotation strategies, combination formulations and resistance monitoring initiatives. In addition to its agronomic advantages, the environmental fate of fluopyram such as its mobility, persistence and degradation characteristics in soil and water and the possibility of food system residues have been the subject of attention. Unlike previous studies focusing on isolated aspects, this review comprehensively links efficacy, environmental dynamics, and mechanistic toxicity of fluopyram across multiple biological systems. It highlights underexplored areas including metabolite toxicity, chronic ecological exposure, and resistance risks. This integrated approach offers valuable insights for safer pesticide management and future research directions.

Indexed as

ecotoxicityenvironmental microbiologyfluopyramfungicide resistancemicrobial transformationSDHI fungicide

Identifiers

PMID42756409
PMCPMC13583435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.