ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2026
Structure-based molecular modeling of a novel S-Remiketamine scaffold and derived arylcyclohexanone analogues: NMDA receptor dynamics, MM-GBSA ranking, and CES1-Oriented structural compatibility.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Short-acting ketamine-related scaffold design remains an important medicinal-chemistry problem, but computational studies require conservative interpretation until receptor, enzymatic, and pharmacokinetic validation is available. Methods: S-ketamine, S-Remiketamine, and R1-R20 analogues were assessed using ligand curation, NMDA receptor docking, cross-target docking, explicit-solvent molecular dynamics, MM-GBSA analysis, CES1-oriented geometric assessment, and predictive ADMET/metabolite-route analysis. Results: Static NMDA docking ranked R2 highest (Glide score -7.308 kcal/mol), while S-Remiketamine showed a more favorable predicted NMDA score than S-ketamine (-6.448 vs. -5.981 kcal/mol). Within the dynamically evaluated subset, NMDA end-state MM-GBSA values were -41.53 kcal/mol for R2, -28.80 kcal/mol for R11, and -42.10 kcal/mol for R14. In CES1 modeling, R14 was the only evaluated compound whose MM-GBSA became more favorable from 0 to 100 ns (-83.91 to -99.44 kcal/mol). Discussion: These results support R2 as the strongest static NMDA docking/NMDA-preference benchmark and R14 as the most internally consistent integrated computational candidate. The findings are hypothesis-generating and require synthesis and experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.