ArticleMedical science educator2026
Learning Communities in Medical Education: Impact, Integration, and Best Practices.
Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Learning communities (LCs) are longitudinal, relationship-centered structures that foster belonging, mentorship, and collaboration across diverse educational settings. This monograph focuses on LCs in undergraduate medical education (UME), summarizing their structures and models; evidence for effects on the learning environment, advising, well-being, and clinical skills; and practical strategies for implementation. We outline common elements of learning communities across the UME spectrum, including protected small-group time, curricular integration, and structured reflection. We then present the Vanderbilt Colleges as a case study demonstrating these design principles in practice. A checklist, pitfalls, and research priorities are offered to support adoption and continuous improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.