ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026
Explainable machine learning for breast mass characterization and malignancy risk stratification: multimodal integration of AI-derived structured digital breast tomosynthesis features and peripheral blood immune-inflammatory biomarkers.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate discrimination between benign and malignant breast masses is essential for biopsy decisions and individualized management. This study aimed to develop an interpretable machine-learning model integrating artificial intelligence (AI)-structured digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) mass features with peripheral blood immune-inflammatory indices. Methods: This retrospective study included 382 patients with 401 pathologically confirmed breast mass lesions (299 benign and 102 malignant) who underwent DBT before pathological examination. AI-structured DBT descriptors, clinical variables, and hematologic inflammatory indices were collected. Lesions were divided into training and testing cohorts using stratified random sampling at a 7:3 ratio. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression was used for feature selection, and five machine-learning models were trained. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration, decision curve analysis, Brier score, and confusion matrix. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to interpret the final model, and predicted probabilities were used for descriptive risk stratification. Results: Logistic LASSO regression selected nine predictors: suspicious calcifications, irregular mass shape, age, long-axis diameter, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), short-axis diameter, oval mass shape, absence of calcifications, and obscured margin. In the testing cohort, the logistic regression model achieved the highest AUROC (0.884, 95% CI: 0.807-0.950), with an accuracy of 0.860, sensitivity of 0.806, specificity of 0.878, and negative predictive value of 0.929. SHAP analysis results indicate that suspicious calcifications, advanced age, irregular morphology, elevated NLR, and larger lesion size may be the primary factors contributing to the prediction of malignancy. The malignancy rate observed in this study ranged from 2.5% in the low-risk group to 67.6% in the high-risk group. Conclusion: The logistic regression (LR) model integrating AI-derived structured DBT features, clinical variables, and peripheral blood immune-inflammatory biomarkers demonstrated favorable performance for breast mass classification and malignancy risk stratification, with a test-set AUROC of 0.884. Prospective multicentre external validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.