Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756325›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Insulin resistance and uric acid-related metabolic disturbances jointly identify individuals at high risk of advanced cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: a population-based study.

Shengzhu Huang, Jingwei Lin, Lingyu Ye, Fuxiang Fang, Yezhou Wu, Xuefang Liang, Junwu Ran, Zhuokun Wei, Fuhua Hu, Yibi Lan and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Shengzhu Huang *Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jingwei Lin *Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Lingyu Ye *Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Fuxiang FangCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yezhou WuCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Xuefang LiangCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Junwu RanCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zhuokun WeiCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Fuhua HuSchool of Life Sciences and Medical Engineering, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yibi LanCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zheng WenCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Mingli LiCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Chao WangCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yu PengBobai County People's Hospital, Yulin, Guangxi, China.
Zengnan MoCenter for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi key Laboratory for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome encompasses metabolic abnormalities, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index reflects insulin resistance-related glucose-lipid imbalance, whereas serum uric acid (SUA) reflects purine metabolism and renal urate handling. However, their independent and joint associations with advanced CKM remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 8,939 adults from the Hakka Biobank baseline survey. Advanced CKM (stages 3-4) was defined according to the American Heart Association framework. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations of TyG and SUA with advanced CKM. Restricted cubic splines assessed nonlinearity, and joint associations used the same-dataset ROC-derived TyG threshold of 8.89 and sex-specific hyperuricemia (HUA) thresholds. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses assessed robustness and heterogeneity, while AUC and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) evaluated in-sample model performance. Results: Among 8,939 participants, 1,164 had advanced CKM. After adjustment, each 1-unit increase in TyG was associated with greater odds of advanced CKM (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.64-2.01), as was each standard deviation increase in SUA (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.28-1.48). TyG showed an approximately linear positive relationship, whereas SUA showed a J-shaped relationship ( Conclusion: Higher TyG and SUA levels, particularly their co-occurrence, were associated with prevalent advanced CKM. These biomarkers may characterize distinct but overlapping metabolic profiles relevant to CKM assessment. Their potential value for community-based evaluation requires confirmation in prospective studies with external validation; no causal or treatment implications can be inferred from these cross-sectional findings.

Indexed as

cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndromemetabolic biomarkersmetabolic dysfunctionserum uric acidtriglyceride-glucose index

Identifiers

PMID42756325
PMCPMC13582521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.