Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756320›Full record

ArticleBME frontiers2026

Ultrasound Brain-Computer Interfaces for Transcranial Closed-Loop Neuromodulation.

Chuhao Yin, Juan Tu

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in BME frontiers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chuhao YinDepartment of Acoustics, School of Physics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Cardiovascular Information and Health Engineering Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3198-8141
Juan TuDepartment of Acoustics, School of Physics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Cardiovascular Information and Health Engineering Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3322-1972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have advanced communication, assistive control, and neurorehabilitation, but most remain readout-oriented systems with limited capacity for deep targeting, focal intervention, and response-guided modulation. Ultrasound offers a distinct route to brain interfacing: functional ultrasound imaging provides spatially localized hemodynamic readout, although current human task-related evidence relies on surgically enabled acoustic access; transcranial focused ultrasound enables noninvasive modulation of cortical and subcortical circuits. We define an ultrasound BCI as a system that converts measured brain activity into a functionally useful output, with ultrasound providing readout, state-contingent write-in, or both; in the closed-loop framework considered here, response assessment updates or constrains subsequent modulation. This Perspective argues that ultrasound BCI should be viewed not as a replacement for established BCIs, but as a transcranial closed-loop acoustic neuromodulation platform. We clarify its boundaries, compare current evidence maturity, and outline translational routes for neurorehabilitation, abnormal brain-state intervention, and deep-brain neurofeedback.

Identifiers

PMID42756320
PMCPMC13583128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.