ReviewFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
Software engineering for reproducible pipeline development in bioinformatics.
Review in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reproducibility in bioinformatics remains challenging despite the availability of workflow management systems and mature computational infrastructures. This work presents a software-engineering perspective for developing reproducible bioinformatics pipelines, with emphasis on pipeline-specific code. We reinterpret the SOLID principles in this context at two levels: workflow management systems (e.g., Nextflow, Snakemake, and Compi) and pipeline implementation. Our approach promotes pipeline designs based on well-defined task interfaces, explicit input/output specifications, and a clear separation between compute tasks and glue/adaptation tasks, in order to improve flexibility, reuse, and maintainability. The paper provides practical guidance for robust and reproducible pipeline development, including systematic validation checks (environment, inputs, and runtime), standardized project organization, and comprehensive testing strategies using both real and synthetic data within continuous integration workflows. It also discusses how modular ecosystems (such as nf-core modules and Snakemake wrappers) support these principles in community-driven environments. Finally, we relate these recommendations to FAIR-oriented research software guidelines (FAIR4RS and FAIRsoft), showing how core engineering practices strengthen robustness, portability, and long-term sustainability, thereby supporting reproducibility in bioinformatics pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.