ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2026
Visual-affect-guided spatiotemporal graph modeling of disaster-image diffusion for embodied decision support.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Disaster-response robots and other embodied agents can use social-media imagery as contextual evidence, but existing approaches typically analyze affect at the image level or model diffusion without isolating affect-specific information. Methods: We encoded disaster images into 128-dimensional continuous visual-affect embeddings representing visual intensity, fear, sadness, and negative valence. These embeddings initialized node states in a time-aware graph neural network whose edges were constrained by observed interaction links, temporal precedence, and spatial reachability. Multi-task heads predicted propagation scale, propagation speed, and spatial-ranking consistency, and a parameter-decomposition module separated affect-associated contributions from structure-associated residuals. Experiments used 4,450 reconstructed image-centered CrisisMMD samples, a common 70/15/15 split, five random seeds, matched baselines, and ablation tests. Results: The full model achieved an AUC of 0.842 ± 0.011, an RMSE of 0.091 ± 0.007 under the current task definition, and a Kendall tau of 0.730 ± 0.018. Relative to matched ablations, visual affect increased AUC by 0.041, time-aware recurrence reduced RMSE by 33.6%, and spatial constraints increased Kendall tau by 0.089. The RMSE unit must be standardized after the propagation-speed versus propagation-time definition is resolved, as marked in the proof. Discussion: Visual affect provides an interpretable complementary signal for modeling disaster-image diffusion. The findings do not establish causal effects, cross-platform generalizability, real-time device performance, or closed-loop robot benefit; the framework should therefore be regarded as an upstream social-sensing prior for embodied decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.