ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Studying dynamic sound source localization in a virtual maze with EEG and psychophysics.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Auditory scene analysis benefits from spatial separation of the sound sources to be disentangled. Studies characterizing the ability to localize sound sources have revealed that spatial ambiguities can be resolved by slightly moving the head. This implies that the auditory system must take into account how head movements displace the sensors (ears) relative to the sound source, in order to separate the consequences of own movement from actual movement of the sound source. Outside of the typical lab, not only the head can be turned, but also the whole body might move towards or away from the sound source. With modern virtual-reality (VR) technology including near-real-time auditory feedback, it has now become feasible to study the relations between body movement, head movement, and sound localization in a controlled manner. Here we present a VR study in which participants move through a virtual maze to locate a repetitive alarm signal. Participants' turning decisions provide a behavioral measure of their ability to localize the sound source. In addition, we introduce occasional task-unrelated location deviations in the alarm signal to record an unobtrusive neural measure of localization ability: the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) component extracted from participants' continuous electroencephalogram (EEG) informs us about participants' deviance detection at the sensory level. We examine these neural and behavioral correlates of sound localization during simulated locomotion and real head movements. Our results show high behavioral accuracy and the elicitation of a robust MMN component. This indicates faithful extraction of source location although participants move relative to the sound source. Our findings are compatible with a predictive-coding framework, where the effects caused by own movement are taken into account for the interpretation of sensory signals. Yet because the range of physical variation by own movement was narrower than intended, we cannot exclude the possibility that deviance detection rested on simpler sensory mechanisms. We discuss how this constraint can be overcome in future studies to fully exploit our new paradigm for naturalistic, yet controlled studies on sound localization and auditory scene analysis under dynamic listening requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.