ArticleMedical science educator2026
Piloting an AI Introduction Program for Incoming Medical Students: A Novel Approach to Medical Education.
Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized for its potential to enhance personalized learning and clinical decision-making in medical education. However, limited integration of AI into medical curricula may leave students feeling underprepared for AI-driven healthcare. This study piloted an AI education program for first-year medical students, assessing post-session perceptions of knowledge, confidence, and perspectives regarding AI in medicine. Methods: An interactive AI session was conducted for 241 first-year medical students at University of Minnesota Medical School. The session included components of lecture, live demonstrations, and exercises with AI tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini, where students applied AI to various educational and clinical scenarios. Discussions included potential benefits, harms, and limitations including ethical implications, bias and privacy concerns. A post-session survey captured students' understanding, perceived utility, and confidence regarding AI use in education and in medicine. Results: Of 241 medical students, 180 attended the session, and 92 of attendees (51%) completed the post-session survey. Findings showed that a majority recognized AI's value for enhancing study efficiency and diagnostic support, with over 50% indicating increased confidence in incorporating AI tools into their education and possible future practice. Concerns emerged around AI reliability, potential over-reliance, and ethical issues, especially regarding data privacy and bias. Conclusions: This pilot study provides preliminary evidence supporting the early introduction of AI concepts in medical education. Students' ethical concerns highlight the need for balanced curricula that combine foundational AI literacy with critical ethical understanding. The study's descriptive, post-session design limits causal inference; future work should incorporate pre- and post-assessments and longitudinal follow-up to evaluate the sustained impact of AI education on clinical competencies and ethical awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.