Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756207›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Alzheimer's disease detection from structural brain MRI using FFA U-Net segmentation and transfer learning.

Nirupama Panabakam, Karthik Elangovan, Koteeswaran Seerangan, Nalini Manogaran, Karthiga Malleeswaran, Sumendra Yogarayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nirupama PanabakamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, VEMU Institute of Technology, Chitoor, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Karthik ElangovanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Computing, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Koteeswaran SeeranganDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, R. M. K. Engineering College (Autonomous), Kavaraipettai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nalini ManogaranDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (Cyber Security), S.A. Engineering College (Autonomous), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Karthiga MalleeswaranDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, Sathyamangalam, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sumendra YogarayanFaculty of Information Science and Technology (FIST), Multimedia University (MMU), Melaka, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that leads to a gradual decline in cognitive and memory function. Multimodal neuroimaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), has become a central diagnostic tool for tracking disease progression, supporting diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-up monitoring. Manual delineation of brain structures by clinicians remains time-consuming and labor-intensive, and computer-assisted segmentation is complicated by spatial and structural variability as well as intensity inhomogeneity across images. This study proposes an integrated framework for automated brain image segmentation and AD classification to address these challenges. Methods: The framework combines a modified U-Net architecture, termed FFA U-Net, with a fine-tuned VGG16 classifier. FFA U-Net incorporates a residual inception module and a feature fusion attention mechanism into the standard U-Net backbone to perform end-to-end brain tissue segmentation. Segmented outputs are subsequently passed to the fine-tuned VGG16 model for classification of AD status. The framework was evaluated on two datasets, ADNI (843 images) and OASIS (416 images), using subject-wise, non-overlapping training, validation, and test splits to prevent data leakage. Results: The proposed framework achieved a segmentation Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.929 and a classification accuracy of 98.90%, based on a single data split. These results were consistent across both the ADNI and OASIS datasets, indicating competitive segmentation and classification performance. Discussion: The findings suggest that combining attention-augmented segmentation with transfer learning-based classification can effectively support automated AD detection from structural MRI, potentially reducing the manual burden on clinicians. As results are based on a single split, further validation using cross-validation or independent cohorts is warranted to confirm robustness and generalizability. The framework should currently be regarded as an experimental research tool that requires additional clinical validation before deployment in practice.

Indexed as

ADNIAlzheimer’s disease detectionbrain MRI segmentationfeature fusion attentionFFA U-NetOASIStransfer learningVGG16

Identifiers

PMID42756207
PMCPMC13582496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.