ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Machine learning-based analysis of key factors and mediating mechanisms of career decision-making difficulties among higher vocational college students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research explores the mechanisms through which multidimensional predictors shape career decision-making difficulties among vocational college students and identifies disparities in career decision-making difficulties across student subgroups with disparate developmental profiles. Survey participants were recruited from vocational institutions in Jiangsu, Anhui, and Guangxi provinces, with nine predictive constructs selected as research variables: sense of place, parental career-related behaviors, psychological resilience, core self-evaluations, vocational self-concept, meaning in life, career adaptability, future time perspective, and career exploration. The study first employs k-means cluster analysis to categorize student subgroups, followed by random forest modelling to pinpoint pivotal variables contributing to subgroup segmentation. Empirical findings unfold in three core aspects. First, sampled vocational students fall into three distinct clusters defined by developmental resources: high-resource, moderate-resource, and low-resource cohorts based on the nine measured variables. Second, measurable graded discrepancies in career decision-making difficulties emerge across the three subgroups. Third, future time perspective, core self-evaluations, career exploration and psychological resilience stand as dominant predictors differentiating student clusters; specifically, future time perspective negatively forecasts career decision-making difficulties via a serial mediating path sequentially through core self-evaluations, psychological resilience and career exploration. By unpacking subgroup heterogeneity of vocational students' career decision-making difficulties from an integrated multi-factor framework, this study furnishes empirical evidence and practical implications for vocational colleges to design targeted career counselling interventions and mitigate students' struggles in career decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.