ArticleCureus2026
Giant Pilomatrixoma: Report of Two Cases and Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pilomatrixoma is a benign adnexal neoplasm derived from hair matrix cells. Giant pilomatrixoma (GP) is an uncommon clinical variant that may pose a diagnostic challenge because of its resemblance to soft tissue neoplasms. We report two cases of GP with distinct clinical presentations. The first case involved a 22-year-old woman presenting with a right suprascapular mass measuring 14 × 8 × 5 cm, with slow progressive enlargement over three years. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-circumscribed lesion with calcification foci. Complete surgical excision was performed, and histopathological examination demonstrated extensive calcium deposits, abundant ghost cells, and scarce basaloid cells, confirming an advanced-stage GP. The second case corresponded to a 54-year-old man with a four-year history of a left retroauricular mass measuring 6.5 × 4.5 × 3 cm. Surgical excision and histopathological analysis confirmed pilomatrixoma. Both patients had favorable postoperative outcomes without recurrence during follow-up. These cases highlight the variable clinical presentation of GP and the diagnostic challenge posed by its large size and atypical presentation. They emphasize the importance of clinicoradiologic and histopathologic correlation for establishing an accurate diagnosis and guiding appropriate surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.