Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756187›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

Evaluation of

Luigi Tordelli Ruda, Loris Bertoldi, Natalia Pedretti, Luca Spaggiari, Samyr Kenno, Samuele Sabbatini, Elena Roselletti, Silvia Bozza, Roberta Gaziano, Eva Pericolini and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Luigi Tordelli Ruda *Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Loris Bertoldi *BMR Genomics s.r.l., Padova, Italy.
Natalia PedrettiHIP-TECH PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Luca SpaggiariDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Samyr KennoDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Dental and Morphological Sciences with Interest in Transplant, Oncological and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Samuele SabbatiniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Elena RosellettiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Silvia BozzaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Roberta GazianoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Eva Pericolini *Department of Surgical, Medical, Dental and Morphological Sciences with Interest in Transplant, Oncological and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Andrea ArdizzoniDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Dental and Morphological Sciences with Interest in Transplant, Oncological and Regenerative Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Claudia Monari *Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common mucosal infection predominantly attributed to Methods: Vaginal samples from 96 non-pregnant women were stratified into three study groups: healthy (NEG, Results: Most SYMP women exhibited a characteristic inflammatory profile, with 75% showing a vaginal pH ≥ 4.5, 95.45% presenting marked PMN infiltration (score 2) and all displaying filamentous Conclusion: These findings identify

Indexed as

anaerobic bacteriaC. albicansCSTvaginal microbiotaVVC

Identifiers

PMID42756187
PMCPMC13582590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.