ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Dendritic-cell depletion and dysfunction in sepsis: a compartment- and evidence-aware synthesis.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis-associated immune dysfunction varies across patients, compartments, and sampling windows. Dendritic cells (DCs) offer a useful-but neither exclusive nor primary-lens because they connect innate sensing with antigen presentation, cytokine instruction, and adaptive immunity. Human studies show reduced circulating DC abundance, altered phenotype, checkpoint context, and impaired ex vivo responsiveness, whereas experimental studies demonstrate splenic DC loss, disturbed bone-marrow generation, impaired anigen-specific T-cell priming, and tissue-specific pDC vulnerability or rescue. These observations support four distinct, potentially coexisting contributions: depletion, dysfunction of residual cells, redistribution, and impaired replacement. A low blood count cannot distinguish among them. Across mechanisms, evidence for developmental supply, survival and cell death, trafficking, antigen presentation, cytokine output, regulatory-like programming, checkpoint signaling, and organelle or metabolic stress varies substantially in identity confidence, model, functional validation, and causal support. Accordingly, human blood evidence is not treated as equivalent to murine marrow, spleen, or lung perturbation, and transcriptomic APC/DC-like states are not equated with demonstrated cellular function. The mouse mregDC-like program remains a Class 4 exploratory regulatory-like state with substantial within-study support but no validated human sepsis homolog. Apparent conflicts-including early inflammatory amplification versus persistent immune suppression, and IL-3-associated inflammation versus late pDC-dependent antiviral rescue-are interpreted as context-, time-, and compartment-dependent rather than forced into a universal sequence. DC-informed monitoring should complement established broader approaches such as monocyte HLA-DR and transcriptomic immune subgrouping, using a transparent ten-domain appraisal of identity and evidence. No DC-only endotype, treatment trigger, bedside biomarker, or DC-directed therapy is validated. This synthesis defines testable, timing-aware, and safety-bounded research hypotheses while keeping clinical claims proportional to the evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.