ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
When chatbots are perceived as "understanding": a study on how virtual agent persona styles and affective interaction promote mental health acceptance.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mental health challenges among university students have become increasingly prevalent, while existing digital interventions often struggle to sustain user engagement and provide meaningful emotional support. Although previous studies have proposed various explanations for the limited acceptance of AI-based mental health chatbots, the role of affective experience remains insufficiently understood. This study proposes an affect-centered framework to examine how different virtual agent persona styles (Listener, Guide, and Motivator) influence university students' psychological acceptance of mental health chatbots. Methods: Drawing on the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), this study developed a dual-pathway model to investigate the mediating role of affective engagement in AI-based mental health chatbot acceptance. Data were collected from 266 university students who were randomly assigned to scenario-based chatbot stimuli representing three virtual agent persona styles. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), artificial neural network (ANN) analysis, and partial least squares multi-group analysis (PLS-MGA) were conducted to examine the proposed relationships and persona-related differences. Results: The results indicate that most proposed hypotheses were supported. Affective engagement emerged as a central mechanism linking persona-related characteristics and psychological acceptance. Multi-group analysis further revealed that although the overall acceptance mechanism remained largely consistent across the three persona conditions, significant differences existed in the strength of key relationships. Specifically, the effect of affective engagement on behavioral intention was stronger in the Guide and Motivator conditions than in the Listener condition. Discussion: These findings suggest that virtual agent persona styles do not fundamentally alter the psychological acceptance mechanism but can influence the strength of critical affective pathways. The study highlights the importance of affective engagement in AI-supported mental health interactions and provides practical implications for designing more adaptive, emotionally responsive, and user-centered mental health chatbots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.