ArticleDEN open2027
Feasibility and Safety Profile of Non-anesthesiologist-administered Propofol During Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Single-center Study of 454 Procedures.
Article in DEN open, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Studies of non-anesthesiologist-administered propofol (NAAP) during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are scarce, particularly in the elderly. We evaluated its feasibility across a broad age range and identified factors associated with sedation-related adverse events. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 454 consecutive colorectal ESD procedures performed with NAAP in 405 patients at a tertiary center (January 2016-May 2024), stratified by age (<65, 65-74, and ≥75 years). Propofol was given by the endoscopy team as a weight-based induction bolus and a continuous infusion titrated to target depth under multiparameter monitoring. New-onset hypotension, bradycardia, and hypoxemia were compared among groups, with multivariable logistic regression for independent predictors. Results: Mean age was 68.2 years; 54.8% of procedures were performed in men. Adverse events were common but all transient: hypotension 14.1%, bradycardia 14.8%, hypoxemia 11.9%, without procedure discontinuation, intubation, anesthesiologist rescue, death, or permanent sequelae. A composite event (33.3%) rose with age (24.7%, 36.1%, and 39.1%; Conclusions: Propofol-based NAAP allowed colorectal ESD to be completed across all age groups without sedation-related procedure termination or escalation of care. Older age and longer procedure duration were associated with selected sedation-related adverse events, providing clinically relevant information for risk assessment during colorectal ESD. Trial Registration: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.