Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42756095›Full record

ArticleDEN open2027

Feasibility and Safety Profile of Non-anesthesiologist-administered Propofol During Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Single-center Study of 454 Procedures.

Yumi Kishi, Mayo Tanabe, Naoyuki Uragami, Daijiro Shiomi, Mai Fukuda, Miho Kurahashi, Toshiki Hanzawa, Michimasa Yamaguchi, Mikio Muraoka, Hatsuka Nakamura and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yumi KishiDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Mayo TanabeDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Naoyuki UragamiDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Daijiro ShiomiDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Mai FukudaDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Miho KurahashiDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Toshiki HanzawaDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Michimasa YamaguchiDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Mikio MuraokaDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Hatsuka NakamuraDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Rei MiyakeDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yukiko OkadaDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Yoichi ToyodaDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Akiko ToshimoriDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Takayoshi ItoDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Noboru YokoyamaDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Haruhiro InoueDigestive Diseases Center Showa Medical University Koto Toyosu Hospital Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Studies of non-anesthesiologist-administered propofol (NAAP) during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are scarce, particularly in the elderly. We evaluated its feasibility across a broad age range and identified factors associated with sedation-related adverse events. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 454 consecutive colorectal ESD procedures performed with NAAP in 405 patients at a tertiary center (January 2016-May 2024), stratified by age (<65, 65-74, and ≥75 years). Propofol was given by the endoscopy team as a weight-based induction bolus and a continuous infusion titrated to target depth under multiparameter monitoring. New-onset hypotension, bradycardia, and hypoxemia were compared among groups, with multivariable logistic regression for independent predictors. Results: Mean age was 68.2 years; 54.8% of procedures were performed in men. Adverse events were common but all transient: hypotension 14.1%, bradycardia 14.8%, hypoxemia 11.9%, without procedure discontinuation, intubation, anesthesiologist rescue, death, or permanent sequelae. A composite event (33.3%) rose with age (24.7%, 36.1%, and 39.1%; Conclusions: Propofol-based NAAP allowed colorectal ESD to be completed across all age groups without sedation-related procedure termination or escalation of care. Older age and longer procedure duration were associated with selected sedation-related adverse events, providing clinically relevant information for risk assessment during colorectal ESD. Trial Registration: N/A.

Indexed as

agedcolorectal neoplasmsendoscopic submucosal dissectionmoderate sedationpropofol

Identifiers

PMID42756095
PMCPMC13582286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.