ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Validating and applying a multidimensional scale to measure public security police stressors in China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Policing is a highly stressful occupation, with considerable implications for officers' mental health and wellbeing. Despite increasing research on police stress, there remains a critical need for culturally relevant and up-to-date measurement tools, particularly in Eastern countries like China. This study aimed to develop and validate a revised version of the Police Stress Scale (PSS)-the Revised Chinese Public Security Police Stressors Scale (CPSPSS-R)-a tool assessing stressors affecting Chinese public security police officers. Methods: The CPSPSS-R was developed using qualitative interviews with 30 police officers and a subsequent psychometric evaluation involving 1,194 in-service officers. The final scale comprised 37 items across four dimensions: excessive workload, lack of skill, organizational issues, and work-family conflict. Results: The CPSPSS-R demonstrated excellent reliability and validity, with confirmatory factor analysis supporting the four-factor structure (χ Conclusions: These findings highlight the demand for differentiated, subgroup-specific stress interventions for police officers. As a psychometrically sound and culturally appropriate scale for evaluating stressors experienced by Chinese public security police officers, the CPSPSS-R yields evidence to enhance police management systems and advance police officers' overall wellbeing. More importantly, this scale establishes a vital assessment framework to detect impairments in police officers' psychological adaptation to occupational strain, supporting the design of precise psychological intervention strategies that maintain their long-term mental well-being under constant work-related stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.