ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Effects of single- and dual-task training on dual-task walking performance, prosthetic-limb dynamics and quality of life in unilateral transtibial amputees.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of the study was to compare the effects of single-task versus dual-task training on dual-task walking performance, prosthetic-limb kinematics, centre-of-pressure behaviour, and health-related quality of life in adults with transtibial amputation. Methods: Forty-five participants undertook an eight-week intervention and were randomly allocated to one of three groups: control, single-task training, or dual-task training. Gait variables were obtained from 3D motion capture and force-plate analysis, while health-related quality of life was assessed using a composite measure derived from the WHOQOL-BREF. Results: Two-way mixed ANOVA showed that both single-task and dual-task training produced significant improvements in dual-task walk-performance time compared with the control group ( Discussion: These findings indicate that an eight-week programme of single- or dual-task training improves walking capability in individuals with transtibial amputation, reflective in improved gait automaticity and more stable, efficient centre-of-pressure transitions from foot strike to push-off in the affected limb. Dual-task training provides additional benefit, producing greater gains across all gait variables and resulting in a significant improvement in perceived quality of life. Future research should examine the long-term transfer of cognitive-motor training to real-world mobility and participation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.