ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Sampling method influences hemolymph bacterial communities in the eastern oyster,
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the microbiome becomes increasingly recognized for its role in driving animal health and disease, accurate characterization of microbial community composition is essential. With this research comes the critical need for standardized sampling methods along with an understanding of the biases inherent to these methods. In oysters, hemolymph is a valuable system for microbiome research due to its diverse physiological functions, role as an indicator of health, and ease of collection. Unfortunately, much of the current literature regarding oyster hemolymph microbiome composition is opaque in its description of tissue collection methods. When these methods are clearly described, investigators often collect hemolymph via a needle inserted into the adductor muscle through a notch cut in the shell. However, due to the needle's movement through soft tissues and mucous membranes exposed to the surrounding seawater, this notch method carries significant risk of sample contamination. An alternative hemolymph sampling method, hereafter referred to as the hole method, minimizes this potential contamination as the needle is inserted through a hole drilled in the shell directly above the adductor muscle, circumventing other soft tissues. Here, we tested whether notch and hole hemolymph collection methods produce different 16S rRNA bacterial community profiles in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.