ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
An accessible path to nature: piloting virtual nature interventions among adults with disabilities by examining heart rate variability.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nature exposure is known to support psychological and physiological well-being, yet individuals living in institutional care often face significant barriers to accessing nature. This pilot study examined the feasibility as well as the physiological effects of tailored virtual nature-based interventions delivered via an immersive dome environment among adults with intellectual and/or physical disabilities. Employing a repeated-measures, within-subject design, this study analyzed heart rate and heart rate variability across multiple interventions to assess physiological responses to virtual nature exposure. Across participants, the interventions were associated with consistent decreases in heart rate variability, while no uniform response pattern was observed for heart rate. Case-level analyses suggested a two-fold response that might depend on the participants' baseline arousal and behavioral profiles. Individuals predominantly described as calm and bedbound exhibited increased cognitive engagement, as reflected by decreased heart rate variability and increased heart rate, whereas individuals described as restless or active exhibited decreases in both heart rate and heart rate variability, possibly indicating cognitive engagement paired with cardiovascular relaxation. This lack of uniform physiological response suggests that the impact of virtual nature exposure may depend on individual characteristics and contextual needs. Taken together, these findings offer preliminary evidence for the feasibility of virtual nature-based interventions in institutional care settings and point to their potential as an accessible and adaptable approach to supporting stress regulation and cognitive engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.