ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Physical exercise therapy for autism spectrum disorder: a scoping review of systematic reviews.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Physical exercise therapy (PET) is used as a non-pharmacological intervention for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the overall evidence landscape remains unclear. Methods: This scoping review adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from database inception to December 4, 2025. Included were systematic reviews that investigated PET for individuals with ASD. Two reviewers independently did data extraction and quality checks (AMSTAR-2). Results: A total of 50 systematic reviews published between 2013 and 2025 were included. Ball sports/team sports, martial arts, mind-body exercises, aquatic therapy, and structured motor skill interventions were the most frequently studied modalities; the included reviews were generally of low methodological quality; most reviews reported improvements in motor skills, social communication, stereotyped behaviors, executive function, and sleep quality, but results were heterogeneous across outcomes; adverse events were rarely reported. Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that PET may improve motor, social, behavioral, and sleep outcomes in individuals with ASD, though these findings are limited by low to critically low methodological quality, high heterogeneity, potential publication bias, and a lack of long-term follow-up. Systematic review registration: The protocol is registered on OSF at DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JVM4H (https://osf.io/jvm4h).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.