ArticleCanadian medical education journal2026
Where is the lifestyle medicine in the Canadian undergraduate medical education curricula? A content analysis.
Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lifestyle Medicine (LM) focuses on preventing and managing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) through evidence-based behavioural and therapeutic interventions. Despite the established efficacy of LM, its integration into Canadian undergraduate medical education (UGME) remains largely unexamined. Methods: We employed a deductive and inductive summative content analysis methodology. We collected publicly available course and program descriptions for each UGME program across Canada. Further, we contacted deans/curriculum leads for additional curriculum documentation. Documents were coded according to references to various domains of LM as defined by the American College of LM and British Society of LM. Results: The sample comprised 13 UGME programs, with 1327 documents included for the final review. Notable variability across institutions was noted with reference to LM integration. LM topics were more frequently included in pre-clerkship and required courses compared to clerkship and electives. Notably, nutrition, mental wellbeing, and physical activity were most frequently referenced, while sleep health and social connectedness were less represented. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the first to formally map the current practices of LM integration in Canadian UGME. Although there were some study limitations (e.g., exclusion of 25% of Canadian UGME programs), this mapping is integral to identify the current state of the curricula and inform future educational initiatives to enhance medical trainees' LM-related knowledge and skills. This in turn, may potentially help address modifiable risk factors for NCDs and improve population health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.