ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026
A review of key technologies on flower picking robot: from perception, planning to non-destructive operations.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flower picking is a labor intensive process heavily in the floriculture industry, and it remains predominantly manual. With the increasing shortage of agricultural labor and the continuous rise in labor costs, the sustainable development of the flower industry is facing severe challenges. Therefore, the using of robotic systems to picking flower plants has become an inevitable trend in the development of modern agriculture. This paper presents a systematic review of recent advances in flower picking robot, with a particular focus on system architecture and core enabling technologies. The core technologies are visual perception and target recognition, motion control and path planning, and flexible, non-destructive end effector design. The research status and limitations of these key technologies are analyzed, with special attention to their applications in both open field and controlled facility environments. Current challenges include low recognition accuracy under complex lighting and occlusion, insufficient end effector adaptability to diverse varieties, and low overall picking efficiency. Future directions include multiple modal sensing integrated with artificial intelligence, bionic and soft robotic end effectors, and multiple robot collaborative system. Finally, based on the perspectives of design and application, the review provides future research directions toward industrialization, with a particular focus on key enabling technologies of these technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.