ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Less water, same buds: moderate drought as a water-saving strategy for indoor cannabis.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drought stress (DS) can restrict plant growth while potentially enhancing secondary metabolism through adaptive physiological responses. However, its effect on cannabinoid production remains uncertain, with previous studies reporting inconsistent findings. This study investigated how DS intensity and timing affect inflorescence biomass, cannabidiol (CBD) concentration, and CBD yield in two chemotype III (CBD-dominant; high-CBD, low-THC) medicinal cannabis genotypes differing in architecture and growth habit.: Two DS intensities were imposed during flowering relative to a well-watered control held at 60-80% of container capacity (CC) with a daily drip supply of 50-300 mL per plant. Under moderate DS, the substrate was allowed to dry to 20-30% CC before a daily replenishment of 50-150 mL was applied to prevent wilting; this cycle was repeated at three flowering stages (early, 46 days after planting [DAP]; mid, 60 DAP; late, 79 DAP). Under severe DS, water was withheld completely until the onset of wilting, as a single event at one of these three stages. Controlled water deficit elicited clear physiological responses, including reductions in relative water content, osmolality, transpiration, photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance, demonstrating effective perception of and adaptation to water limitation. Despite these responses, drought stress had only limited effects on inflorescence biomass and cannabinoid yield. Severe DS consistently impaired plant performance and provided no agronomic advantage. Although it sharply raised leaf-level water-use efficiency (WUEi), this reflected a short-term survival response achieved at the expense of carbon assimilation. Moderate DS reduced water consumption without negatively affecting biomass or CBD yield. Notably, genotype exerted a stronger influence on productivity and cannabinoid accumulation than the imposed irrigation regime. These findings indicate that severe drought stress is not a suitable strategy for enhancing cannabis production. Instead, moderate water deficit represents a practical approach to improving water-use efficiency while maintaining yield under controlled-environment cultivation. Overall, optimizing genotype selection appears to be a more effective strategy for maximizing productivity and cannabinoid yield than applying drought stress to stimulate secondary metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.