Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755924›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026

A novel image-based algorithm to support future remote assessment of chewing function.

Dawn Branley-Bell, Richard Brown, Elias Obreque-Sepúlveda, Claire McGrogan, Helen Cartner, Elhassan Mohamed, Chee Siang Ang, Robert Pellegrino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dawn Branley-BellSchool of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Richard BrownSchool of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Elias Obreque-SepúlvedaSchool of Engineering, Physics & Mathematics, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Claire McGroganSchool of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Helen CartnerSchool of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Elhassan MohamedSchool of Sciences, Psychology, Arts and Humanities, Computing, Engineering, and Sport, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom.
Chee Siang AngSchool of Computing, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom.
Robert PellegrinoMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chewing difficulty is associated with poorer physical and mental health. Objective measurement of chewing function is currently limited to methods that require specialist lab equipment (for example lab-based manipulation or comminution tests). A remote method for estimating chewing-related metrics would support the development of accessible and scalable means of detecting and monitoring chewing-related health issues. Method: This paper details initial work on developing a novel smartphone-based, image-analysis algorithm to estimate particle-size metrics from photographs of masticated raw carrot deposited in a Petri dish. A two-stage image-processing pipeline was developed, comprising geometric calibration and particle segmentation, enabling estimation of particle-size metrics from smartphone photographs. The algorithm was implemented both as a Python script and as a graphical user interface (GUI), the latter allowing semi-automated per-image adjustment of calibration and segmentation parameters with visual feedback. The script and graphical user interface (GUI) are publicly available: osf.io/kgx9f. Results: Performance was evaluated on artificially generated test images to benchmark the algorithm against ground-truth data with known sizes, while also assessing data-collection processes, usability and key challenges. On the more realistic synthetic-particle images, which include overlapping particles of varying size, the algorithm produced a cumulative area error of 20.6% and a mean per-particle relative error of 21.1% (median 14.8%; mean absolute error 1.02 mm Conclusion: The algorithm demonstrates quantifiable analytical performance in estimating chewing-related particle-size metrics from smartphone images, supporting its potential use as a foundation for future remote measurement of chewing function. However, the method is not yet clinically validated. In its current form, the method achieves its best performance through a semi-automated, GUI-based workflow, which introduces a subjective element but provides a practical way to handle heterogeneous image conditions and inform future automation.

Indexed as

chewing functioncomminutiondigital healthimage analysisimage segmentationmasticatory performanceparticle sizeremote assessment

Identifiers

PMID42755924
PMCPMC13581933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.