Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755901›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

MRI radiomics-based predictive modeling for risk stratification and prognostication in oral tongue carcinoma.

Nivedita Chakrabarty, Swapnil U Rane, Umesh Sherkhane, Sourabh More, Nitin Shetty, Sarbani Ghosh Laskar, Arjun Singh, Vanita Noronha, Kumar Prabhash, Pankaj Chaturvedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nivedita ChakrabartyDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Swapnil U RaneAdvanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.
Umesh SherkhaneAdvanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.
Sourabh MoreDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Nitin ShettyDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Sarbani Ghosh LaskarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Arjun SinghAdvanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.
Vanita NoronhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Pankaj ChaturvediAdvanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Navi Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), to stratify risk using radiomics, radiology semantic, clinical, and pathology models-individually and in combination-derived from pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), post-operative histopathology, age, and adjuvant therapy details in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC), and to correlate National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) low + intermediate- and high-risk groups with the risk stratification provided by the radiomics models. The secondary objectives included predicting post-operative perineural invasion (PNI), metastatic lymph nodes, and pathological extranodal extension (pENE). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 219 treatment-naive OTSCC patients who underwent pre-treatment MRI (January 2021-December 2022) with 2-year follow-up. Radiomics features were extracted from T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c) sequences. Lasso-Cox and DeepSurv models were evaluated for RFS and OS prediction, while random forest and logistic regression models were assessed for PNI, metastatic lymph nodes, and pENE prediction. Radiomics, radiology semantic, clinical, and pathology models were evaluated individually and in combination. Risk stratification was evaluated using the log-rank test. Results: Among 219 patients (mean age 46.99 ± 10.94 years), Lasso-Cox outperformed DeepSurv for RFS and OS prediction. The radiomics combined model (T1 + T2 + T1c radiomics + radiology semantic + clinical + pathology) achieved the best performance for RFS and non-inferior performance to the pathology model for OS prediction. The pre-treatment radiomics models effectively stratified the patients into high- and low-risk groups for recurrence and OS and also identified low-risk patients within the NCCN high-risk group and high-risk patients within the NCCN low + intermediate-risk group for recurrence. The T1c radiomics model demonstrated the best overall performance for predicting metastatic lymph nodes. The radiology semantic features model demonstrated the highest predictive performance for PNI and pENE. Conclusions: The radiomics combined and pre-treatment radiomics models demonstrate potential for prognostication and risk-adapted management. By identifying low-risk patients within the NCCN high-risk group and high-risk patients within the NCCN low + intermediate-risk group for recurrence, these models may support treatment de-escalation and escalation, respectively, pending prospective multicenter validation. Furthermore, prediction of metastatic lymph nodes, PNI, and pENE from pre-treatment radiomics models may inform decisions regarding elective neck dissection and guide adjuvant therapy following prospective validation.

Indexed as

MRI-based radiomicsoral tongue cancerpredictive modelingprognostic modelingrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID42755901
PMCPMC13581926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.