ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2026
Quantum-edge synergy for dynamic acoustic compensation in ultrasound safety: a narrative review of tissue heterogeneity challenges.
Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Conventional ultrasound safety monitoring relies on the Mechanical Index (MI) and Thermal Index (TI), which lack tissue-specificity. Consequently, real-time safety profiling remains imprecise. Dynamic, tissue-specific corrections such as tissue perfusion rate (TPR) aim to address this limitation. This narrative review examines how integrating these corrections with quantum-cloud computational frameworks may enable enhanced safety and image quality in ultrasonic applications. Objective: We assessed the potential of an integrated quantum-cloud framework to reduce ultrasound-related bioeffects without compromising image quality, compared to standard MI/TI monitoring in patients undergoing clinical ultrasound imaging. Methods: A narrative synthesis of the eligible literature was performed, guided by thematic analysis frameworks. Quantitative outcomes were descriptively summarized with medians and ranges; formal meta-analysis was not conducted because heterogeneity in TPR measurement protocols, device manufacturers, and outcome definitions violated the commutability assumption required for statistical pooling. Results: Qualitative synthesis indicated that tissue-specific, multi-parameter correction strategies were consistently associated with more conservative acoustic exposure and heightened safety awareness than static MI/TI monitoring alone, although the consistency and clinical magnitude of these benefits varied across anatomical applications and study designs. The certainty of the current evidence was judged low to moderate, limited by non-standardized TPR measurement protocols and heterogeneous outcome definitions. Conclusions: Together, these data suggest that multi-parameter acoustic correction coupled with cloud computing holds promise for improving ultrasound safety profiling and imaging precision. However, the current low-to-moderate certainty of evidence, due to methodological heterogeneity, necessitates future validation of edge-cloud synergies to realize robust, personalized monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.