ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Temporal complementarity in lower-limb neuromuscular control and kinetic asymmetries: implications for elite speed-climbing performance.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study applied statistical parametric mapping (SPM) to examine temporal differences in bilateral lower limb neuromuscular control and kinetics during unilateral countermovement jumps (CMJ) in speed climbers, and to explore their relationship with sport-specific performance. Methods: Fourteen elite male climbers completed unilateral CMJs and a standard 15 m speed climb. Surface electromyography and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) were synchronously recorded. Root mean square amplitudes, knee/ankle co-contraction indices (CCI), and time-varying vGRF curves were computed, alongside asymmetry indices. SPM assessed bilateral temporal differences across the CMJ cycle, while Pearson correlation evaluated links between asymmetry and climbing time. Results: SPM results showed significantly higher activation of rectus femoris, biceps femoris, and tibialis anterior, as well as greater knee and ankle CCI in the left limb at specific phases (p < 0.05). vGRF exhibited phase-dependent asymmetry: the left leg produced greater force during rapid loading (30-32%), whereas the right leg showed higher output during the peak phase (90-94%). Climbing time was positively correlated with vGRF asymmetry (r = 0.61, p = 0.028), but not with CCI asymmetry (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Results indicate clear functional differentiation. The left limb showed higher activation and co-contraction during braking, propulsion, and peak phases, primarily for stabilization. The right limb generated higher force during propulsion and peak phases, serving an explosive role. Notably, only vGRF asymmetry, and not neuromuscular asymmetry, was associated with performance. These findings suggest that training may prioritize balancing macroscopic kinetic output (i.e., reducing vGRF asymmetry) rather than pursuing inter-limb neuromuscular symmetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.