ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Integrating olfactory assessments in consciousness disorders: methodologies and therapeutic potential.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Current clinical assessments for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDOC) primarily depend on visual and auditory approaches, which often result in misdiagnosis. The olfactory system possesses a distinct anatomical pathway that projects directly to the cortex without thalamic relay, which may retain responsiveness in pDOC patients. Preliminary evidence suggests a link between smelling and consciousness processes, yet there is a gap in applying these findings clinically. Methods: This review combines insights from neuroanatomy, behavioral neuroscience, and neuromodulation studies to propose a framework based on olfaction for assessing and encouraging consciousness recovery. Literature searches were conducted across PubMed, and Web of Science, for studies published from January 2010 to January 2026, with earlier key works identified through reference screening. Results: Sensory and cognitively driven sniff response test in pDOC olfactory processing serves as a sensitive biomarker for distinguishing between vegetative and minimally conscious states (MCS) in a single study, and may predict early recovery. Protocols for bedside olfactory discrimination provide quick screening methods but lack multicenter validation. Olfactory training is frequently combined with other senses to improve effectiveness, precluding isolation of its specific contribution. Neuromodulation approaches show preliminary effects on brain rhythms in healthy volunteers, while olfactory electrical stimulation and neurofeedback remain at proof-of-concept stage. No dedicated olfactory rehabilitation protocol has been evaluated in pDOC cohorts. Conclusion: Olfactory assessment and stimulation represent a promising but nascent frontier in pDOC care. The sniff response test currently has the strongest empirical foundation, yet all approaches require multicenter validation. Future research should prioritize personalized key odor identification, standardized stimulation protocols, and rigorous clinical trials of neuromodulation techniques. Integrating olfactory measures into multimodal strategies may improve diagnostic accuracy and support consciousness recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.