Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755764›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Integrating conformal prediction with machine learning for uncertainty-aware risk stratification in coronary artery disease.

Shengnan Lin, Xuyang Hu, Yang Zhang, Qi Zhang, Xiaoning Wang, Yang Yang, Fuzheng Song, Yutong Li, Yushan Liu, Yuanpeng Zhao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shengnan LinDepartment of Cardiology, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Xuyang HuDepartment of Cardiology, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yang ZhangCollege of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Qi ZhangDepartment of Out-Patient, Dalian Baichuan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Xiaoning WangCollege of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Yang YangDepartment of Cardiology, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Fuzheng SongDepartment of Cardiology, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yutong LiDepartment of Cardiology, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yushan LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yuanpeng ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Dingjian ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology, Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Minghua Nan *Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Changchuan Bai *Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Predictive models are increasingly used in clinical decision-making in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, most existing models focus on discriminative ability while ignoring individual prediction uncertainty, which is particularly prominent in small-sample contexts, limiting clinical applications. Methods: We developed an uncertainty-aware model integrating machine learning and conformal prediction (CP) for CAD prediction in a small-sample setting cohort ( Results: Both LR and RF show strong discrimination (AUC 0.953 and 0.951). LR is slightly better calibrated, while RF is more accurate. CP efficiently quantifies uncertainty. Union and intersection achieve higher coverage, whereas MSCP with voting balances coverage and efficiency. The combined RF-MSCP model maintains empirical coverage above the nominal level across all significance thresholds, demonstrating robust uncertainty assessment and risk prediction in small-sample settings. Conclusion: The integration of CP with machine learning has led to the development of the RF-MSCP model, which provides reliable uncertainty quantification for CAD risk prediction, especially in small sample settings. By identifying potentially high-risk individuals overlooked by traditional models, this approach improves predictive discrimination and supports more robust clinical decision.

Indexed as

conformal predictioncoronary artery diseasemachine learningrisk stratificationuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID42755764
PMCPMC13581787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.