Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755737›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Specificity and flexibility in sensory substitution: learning to grasp with vibration on one or two fingers.

Saroosh Bilal, Raoul M Bongers, David M Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saroosh BilalFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Raoul M BongersUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
David M JacobsFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory substitution gloves (SSGs) are gloves that provide stimulation to the hand based on information such as the distance to objects in the environment. In recent years, it has been shown that SSGs enable users to interact with objects in the environment, including the grasping of objects. Important for the current study, different configurations of SSGs have been tested, and performance with SSGs has been shown to improve with practice. This led to the main question of our study: Does practice with one configuration of an SSG transfer to another configuration? The SSG that we used had actuators on the index finger and thumb that could vibrate when a finger pointed in the direction of a target. The vibration was more intense if the finger was closer to the object. Two modes of functioning were used: with vibration only on the index finger or with vibration on both fingers. In the reported experiment, 58 participants were divided into two groups that practiced a reaching and grasping task using the SSG either in the one-finger or two-finger mode. Before and after practice, both groups were tested in both conditions. Although average performance was better with two fingers than with one, substantial improvements were observed in both conditions, indicating a large amount of bidirectional transfer. These results are consistent with the interpretation that training with one or two fingers are different ways to improve the same functional system.

Indexed as

active perceptionfunctional organizationinformationperceptual systemreaching and graspingsensory substitution glovetransfer of learning

Identifiers

PMID42755737
PMCPMC13581827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.