ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The role of universities in enhancing interprofessional collaboration during COVID-19 in Lebanon: academia as neutral convener in a public-private twinning initiative-a qualitative case study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic underscored the importance of interprofessional collaboration, including partnerships between academic institutions and healthcare organizations. Such collaborations, however, are challenging to initiate and sustain during public health emergencies. This study examines the role and perceived effectiveness of academic involvement within a public-private twinning initiative designed to strengthen COVID-19 response capacities in Lebanon. Methods: Using a qualitative case study design, we conducted 25 semi-structured interviews between January and February 2022 with faculty members, clinicians, hospital administrators, and representatives of the tripartite initiative, as part of a broader study period that began in November 2021 with ethics approval and participant recruitment. Participants were purposively selected based on their involvement in the capacity-building project. Data was analyzed thematically. Results: Perceptions of academic involvement varied across participant groups. A majority of interviewees ( Conclusion: Academic engagement was perceived as beneficial when it supported knowledge transfer, coordination, and structured problem-solving. However, its effectiveness was constrained by contextual factors, especially crisis-driven timing and unclear communication pathways. Strengthening academic partnerships in crisis-prone, resource-constrained systems requires early involvement, clear role definition, and sustained channels for intersectoral collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.