Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755661›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Exploring traditional Chinese medicine to enhance the efficacy and reduce toxicity of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer from the perspective of "spleen deficiency": a trial protocol for mechanism and clinical evidence.

Cunya Li, Xiaonan Zhang, Shujuan Fu, Pantong Wu, Zhiying Wang, Zhixian Zhong, Yi Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cunya Li *Oncology Department, Shanghai TCM-Intergrated Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaonan Zhang *Oncology Department, Shanghai TCM-Intergrated Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shujuan Fu *Oncology Department, Shanghai TCM-Intergrated Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Pantong WuOncology Department, Shanghai TCM-Intergrated Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhiying WangDepartment of Oncology I, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhixian ZhongDepartment of Oncology, East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Yi ZhongOncology Department, Shanghai TCM-Intergrated Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), their low response rates and immune-related adverse reactions (irAEs) remain serious challenges. Traditional Chinese medicine believes that "spleen deficiency" is the core pathogenesis of advanced lung cancer, and its corresponding immune suppression and metabolic disorders may be related to the efficacy of ICIs. This paper aims to explore the clinical application status and potential mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicine combined with ICIs based on the "strengthening the spleen". Literature analysis shows that traditional Chinese medicines for invigorating spleen have shown positive trends in improving patients 'quality of life and reducing irAEs. Their mechanism of action may involve pathways such as regulating the "gut-lung axis" and reshaping the tumor immune microenvironment. However, this field still faces challenges such as the lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials, inconsistent dialectical standards, and unclear molecular mechanisms. Accordingly, we designed the present trial to explore the therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of JPGC combined with ICIs in patients with NSCLC. Methods/design: The evaluation design of the JPGC clinical trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The sample size is 56, and there are 28 participants in the test group and control group respectively. The test group received JPGC, and the control group received JPGC placebo. There is a course of treatment every 21 days for a total of 4 courses. The main outcomes include 6-month PFS rate, secondary outcomes include PFS, exploratory study endpoints include TCM syndrome integral, EORTC QLQ-C30, ECOG score, intestinal barrier, intestinal flora, inflammatory cytokines, T cell subsets, etc. Discussion: We predict that by repairing the intestinal barrier and adjusting the stability of intestinal flora to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer patients will improve spleen deficiency and quality of life through JPGC. This study used TCM syndrome analysis, laboratory tests, imaging examinations and other indicators to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of JPGC. Fecal metabolomic analyses will be implemented in trial subjects to explore the latent synergistic mechanisms associated with JPGC intervention. This is a traditional Chinese medicine trial to observe and treat advanced NSCLC characterized by spleen deficiency syndrome by directly regulating intestinal flora. If successful, this discovery will have value in antitumor therapies and drug development, especially in the "immune era." Clinical Trial Registration: https://itmctr.ccebtcm.org.cn, identifier ITMCTR2025002090.

Indexed as

immunotherapyJianpi Guchang prescriptionNSCLCspleen deficiency typetraditional Chinese medicine (TCM)

Identifiers

PMID42755661
PMCPMC13581700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.