ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Case Report: Iparomlimab and Tuvonralimab-based therapy for epithelioid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a three-case series.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epithelioid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (EMPM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy of serosal origin. Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is generally reserved for carefully selected patients in whom adequate cytoreduction appears feasible, while evidence supporting systemic immunotherapy remains limited for patients with unresectable disease or those unable to tolerate intensive treatment. Iparomlimab and tuvonralimab (QL1706) is a fixed-ratio anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 MabPair formulation that has shown preliminary antitumor activity in several advanced solid tumors, but clinical experience in EMPM remains scarce. Case presentation: We retrospectively describe three patients with EMPM diagnosed through integrated clinicopathologic assessment who received QL1706 either as monotherapy or in combination with an antiangiogenic agent. Treatment response was assessed by the treating team on serial computed tomography (CT) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as the evaluation framework. Results: Case 1 was a 53-year-old woman with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) of 10. Diffuse peritoneal disease persisted after surgery and three sessions of postoperative catheter-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. QL1706 plus bevacizumab subsequently produced stable disease with symptomatic improvement for approximately 7 months. Case 2 was an 89-year-old man with a PD-L1 CPS of 0 who was considered unsuitable for surgery or intensive chemotherapy. QL1706 plus dose-reduced lenvatinib achieved a partial response that remained ongoing for more than 10 months. Case 3 was a 70-year-old man with a PD-L1 CPS of 55 and pre-existing nephrotic syndrome. QL1706 monotherapy induced a rapid partial response, but treatment was discontinued because of worsening proteinuria and edema; the disease subsequently progressed, with a new intracranial lesion radiologically suspicious for metastasis. Conclusion: QL1706-based therapy achieved disease control in all three patients with EMPM who had limited conventional treatment options, including a durable response in an elderly patient with PD-L1-negative disease and rapid tumor regression with QL1706 monotherapy. The contrasting clinical courses suggest that overall benefit depends not only on tumor sensitivity but also on the accompanying treatment strategy and baseline organ function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.