Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42755610›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Estimating historic and recent non-sexual HIV transmission to women in sub-Saharan Africa.

David Gisselquist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David GisselquistIndependent Researcher, Hershey, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The proportion of HIV infections in sub-Saharan Africa from non-sexual risks has been debated for decades. This article estimates that proportion for women. Methods: Use information from studies of discordant couples and from national surveys to estimate women's incidence from sexual transmission and average male-to-female sexual transmission. Compare those estimates to historic increases in women's infections and to recent incidence. Results: Based on four studies reporting incidence in women in discordant couples and on information from national surveys, annual HIV incidence in women from sexual transmission as a percent of women's prevalence as well as annual male-to-female transmission averaged across all infected men can both be (generously) estimated at 10%. In 10 of the 11 countries that reached at least 10% adult prevalence, percentages of pregnant women infected in sentinel surveys or estimated numbers of infected women by country increased at compound annual rates of 17-58% for multi-year periods during 1985-2000; if women's incidence from sexual transmission was 10% of women's prevalence, non-sexual transmission accounted for an estimated 41-83% of women's infections during those periods. Similarly, if 10% of men with unsuppressed viral loads sexually infect one woman per year, an estimated 65% of women's incident infections in 10 national surveys during 2019-25 were from non-sexual transmission. Discussion: According to evidence presented here, most HIV infections in women in sub-Saharan have been from blood-borne risks. Investigations of infections suspected from skin-piercing healthcare and cosmetic procedures can find and fix transmitting procedures and warn the public about blood-borne risks.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsAdultAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleHumansIncidenceMalePregnancyPrevalenceAfricablood-borneHIVnosocomialwomen

Identifiers

PMID42755610
PMCPMC13581622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.