ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Progression of bilateral adrenal incidentalomas: a monocentric cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Bilateral adrenal incidentalomas (BAIs) are increasingly detected during abdominal imaging. Their initial clinical, hormonal, and radiological presentation is heterogeneous, and their natural history remains unclear. Current ESE/ENS@T guidelines lack specific recommendations for BAIs management. Methods: Retrospective single-center cohort study enrolling 185 consecutive non-operated patients referred between 2009 and 2023 to our endocrinology unit for BAIs (≥10 mm) with thorough assessment of hormonal, genetic and radiological data. Exclusion criteria were interfering comorbidities or incomplete data. Finally, 120 patients (63 females, mean age = 64.8 ± 8.2) were enrolled. Of these, 64 and 61 patients completed a minimum biochemical and radiological follow-up of 36 months, respectively. Results: At baseline, 56% of patients had mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS; 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test [1 mgDST] >1.8 µg/dl), and 44% had non-functioning (NF) BAIs. During follow-up, 32.1% of NF patients developed MACS (biochemical progression, BP), while 67.9% remained NF (biochemical stability, BS). Furthermore, 44.3% of patients showed radiological progression (RP) (increase in number and/or size of nodules ≥3 mm). The BP group had significantly higher baseline 1 mgDST values than the BS group (median: 1.3 vs. 1.1 µg/dl, Conclusions: A non-negligible percentage of BAIs show hormonal and/or radiological progression. Our findings suggest that BAIs may represent a subgroup warranting individualized clinical reassessment and further prospective multicenter studies to define optimal surveillance strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.