ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Development of a spatial skills test for 4th grade primary school students: validity and reliability study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although several instruments have been developed to assess spatial skills, most were designed for older students, emphasize specific components of spatial ability, or have not been specifically designed to reflect the developmental characteristics and mathematics curriculum of fourth-grade primary school students. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a valid and reliable spatial skills test specifically designed for fourth-grade primary school students. The study employed a quantitative methodological instrument development design. First, a literature review was conducted to generate an item pool, after which the test's content validity was established through expert evaluations. The draft test was administered to 360 fourth-grade students attending public primary schools in the Black Sea Region of Türkiye during the 2024-2025 academic year. Item difficulty and discrimination indices, corrected item-total correlations, lower-upper group comparisons, the Kuder-Richardson-20 (KR-20) reliability coefficient, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Rasch model analysis were used to evaluate the instrument's psychometric properties. The findings resulted in a final 23-item test consisting of three dimensions: spatial visualization, spatial relations, and spatial orientation. The KR-20 coefficient was 0.827, indicating good internal consistency, while the Rasch analysis demonstrated acceptable item fit and satisfactory person separation reliability. Although the CFA provided partial support for the proposed three-dimensional structure, the construct validity evidence was strengthened by the complementary findings obtained from the Rasch model and classical test theory analyses. Overall, the findings indicate that the developed instrument provides promising evidence of validity and reliability for assessing the spatial skills of fourth-grade primary school students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.