ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Time-Series modeling for predicting mortality risk in intensive care unit patients with pulmonary inflammation.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate dynamic changes in pneumonia-related mortality risk among ICU patients using time-series models and develop interpretable predictive models for early mortality assessment. Methods: Data were obtained from the MIMIC-IV and eICU Collaborative Research Database. The MIMIC-IV cohort was split into training and testing sets (7:3 ratio), with external validation conducted using the eICU cohort. Missing data were handled using forward filling and multiple imputation. LSTM was used to extract temporal features, which were then entered into five machine-learning classifiers: logistic regression, random forest (RF), Light Gradient Boosting Machine, extreme gradient boosting, and multilayer perceptron. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using cross-validation and grid search. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, balanced accuracy, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), AUC, Brier score, and Youden's index. The best-performing model was interpreted using Shapley Additive Explanations and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations. Results: A total of 4,205 patients were included, including 2,751 patients from MIMIC-IV and 1,454 patients from the eICU cohort. The 7-day mortality rates were 7.92% and 11.69%, respectively. The hybrid LSTM-RF model performed exceptionally, achieving an accuracy of 0.961, precision of 0.938, recall of 0.823, F1 score of 0.874, AUC of 0.940, Balanced ACC of 0.914, and MCC of 0.862. The LSTM-RF model yielded a Brier score of 0.020 and Youden's index of 0.818. Validation results showed an AUC of 0.826, a Brier score of 0.070, and a Youden's index of 0.590. Conclusion: Integrating random forest with LSTM-derived features improves early mortality risk prediction in ICU patients with pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.